Rewording and Restructuring Menu Options (ATA Experiment 109)
ETH -19 -1462Last modified on December 19th, 2025 at 10:19 am
-
Abstract
PxD is partnering with Ethiopia’s Agricultural Transformation Agency (ATA) to help improve the effectiveness of their voice-based mobile-phone advisory service, the 8028 hotline, by conducting continuous iterations and experiments, as well as by making suggestions for improvements to and customization of the service. The service has millions of registered farmers and represents the first in Africa to be maintained by a government entity at such a large scale.
The 8028 hotline Interactive Voice Response (IVR) system uses phone key navigation. Menu options for advisory content were labeled using technical or scientific terminology (e.g., “Pre-planting”). Qualitative investigations, including focus group discussions and in-depth interviews, revealed that many farmers did not understand these labels. As a result, they often could not predict what kind of advice each menu would include. This likely limited their ability to access the information most relevant to them and may have reduced the overall usefulness of the service. While farmers showed a reasonable distribution of preferences across crop-specific menus in qualitative investigations, most callers defaulted to pressing option 1 in the main menu—possibly because they didn’t fully understand the meaning or purpose of the other options.
Findings from “Rotate Menu Seasonally (ATA Experiment 108)” demonstrated that users’ choices were strongly influenced by menu position; here we examine whether unclear menu labeling also affects user behavior. To improve content access, we tested whether rewording and restructuring how menu options are presented would help users to make more informed choices to access relevant content. We find limited evidence that rewording menu options led to changes in user behavior; the majority of users still selected the first menu option. The experiment was conducted outside the seasonal crop menu rotation experiment, which means option 1 consistently referred to "pre-planting"—a possible reason for the persistent default behavior. -
Status
Completed
-
Start date
Q3 Jul 2019
-
Experiment Location
Ethiopia
-
Partner Organization
Ethiopian ATA
-
Agricultural season
_N/A
-
Experiment type
A/B test
-
Sample frame / target population
8028 hotline Amharic language users
-
Sample size
177,741
-
Outcome type
Information access, Platform engagement
-
Mode of data collection
PxD administrative data
-
Research question(s)
Does rewording and restructuring how menu options are presented change menu selection?
-
Research theme
Communication technology
-
Research Design
Users were randomly assigned to the control group or one of two treatment arms:
Control group (n = 88,672): Menu options remained technical or scientific terminology (e.g., “Pre-planting”).
Treatment Arm 1 (T1; n = 44,518): Menu options were reworded to plain-language descriptions of the content category (e.g., “Things you should do before you plant”).
Treatment Arm 2 (T2; n = 44,551): Menu options were restructured to give examples of the subtopics available under each menu (e.g., “For insect control, disease control, or weed control, press 3”).
This experiment was conducted from July 2019 to February 2020. We used administrative platform data to measure the main outcome of interest, menu selection.
For more information on a previous trial, see Rotate Menu Seasonally (ATA Experiment 108).
-
Results
We find limited evidence that rewording menu options led to changes in user behavior; the majority of users still selected the first menu option. Specifically, the proportion of users who selected the first menu option for pre-planting was 34%, 33%, and 34% for T1, T2, and the control group, respectively. The proportion of users who selected other menus was only 16%, 16%, and 17% for T1, T2, and the control group, respectively. These findings suggest that users’ menu selection may have been influenced more by the order of options than by the menu names. This aligns with findings from Experiment 108, which showed that menu position plays a dominant role in user choice.