not-registered Login to view full entry:

The Effect of a Language Preference Question on Quiz Scores

KEN -18 -1401

    Basic Information

  • Abstract
    PxD operates the MoA-INFO platform in collaboration with Kenya’s Ministry of Agriculture to provide free agricultural recommendations to farmers via SMS messages. To recruit farmers to the service, PxD worked with Safaricom (a large Kenyan phone company) to send SMS messages to owners of mobile phones in rural areas; the messages had a keyword in English or Swahili (“FARM” or “SHAMBA”) that farmers could use to register. Farmers who texted the keyword to the MoA-INFO shortcode were sent a registration survey. This experiment builds on a language prompt experiment “The Effect of a Language Prompt on Farmers’ Platform Engagement”, which tested whether offering users the option to switch languages affected registration, retention, and engagement with the MoA-INFO platform. That study found increased initial completion rates when users could choose their preferred language, but it did not find a sustained impact on engagement. This A/B test aimed to measure whether asking farmers about their preferred language affects their comprehension of the information in the registration survey content, as measured by their performance on a comprehension quiz.

    Farmers who had been sent a registration survey were randomly assigned to the treatment group, who received an SMS asking them which language they preferred, or the control group, who did not receive the language preference question. Approximately one thousand farmers were randomly selected to receive an SMS invitation to take a quiz to test their knowledge about Fall armyworm (FAW). This randomization was stratified by treatment status if the user had been offered the opportunity to switch languages in the registration survey, and language of registration message (English or Swahili), resulting in four groups of equal size ~250. Users who were given the option to switch languages scored slightly higher on the quiz when scoring only the questions for which they provided a response. The treatment had a slightly negative effect on quiz scores calculated by the number of correct responses out of all questions, whether or not farmers provided a response. These results are not statistically significant and the findings do not provide supporting evidence that the opportunity to switch languages has a positive effect on the FAW comprehension quiz scores.
  • Status
    Completed
  • Start date
    Q4 Oct 2018
  • End date
    Q4 Oct 2018
  • Experiment Location
    Kenya
  • Partner Organization
    Kenya Ministry of Agriculture
  • Agricultural season
    Short Rains
  • Research Design

  • Experiment type
    A/B test
  • Sample frame / target population
    MoA-INFO platform users (farmers)
  • Sample size
    994
  • Outcome type
    Knowledge, Service engagement
  • Mode of data collection
    Automated survey
  • Research question(s)
    Does the opportunity to switch languages at the start of registration increase scores on a subsequent information comprehension quiz?
  • Research theme
    Communication technology, Message narration
  • Research Design

    The sample was stratified by treatment status and language of the original registration message, forming four groups of roughly equal size:

    • Control & Swahili (n = 248)
    • Control & English (n = 249)
    • Treatment & Swahili (n = 248)
    • Treatment & English (n = 249)

    The treatment group received, as their first message, a question about their preferred language with a choice between English and Swahili. The control group was sent directly to the first question of the survey.

    The quiz contained four questions covering key topics related to FAW: recognizing signs of FAW, using early planting as a preventive measure, destroying FAW caterpillars and egg masses, and using pesticides. This design enabled testing for both the overall impact of the language-selection prompt and any differential effects by language.

    See more information on the experiment “The Effect of a Language Prompt on Farmers’ Platform Engagement” that this experiment builds on.

  • Results

  • Results
    Overall 11.97% of users in the sample switched languages: 7.34% switched to Swahili and 4.63% to English. We find no notable differential effects by language, and no supporting evidence that the opportunity to switch languages has a positive effect on the FAW comprehension quiz scores.

    Farmers who received the SMS question about their preferred language were slightly less likely to reply to the SMS invitation to take the quiz, less likely to start the quiz, and had a lower test score, but none of these results were statistically significant. The proportion of people that started the quiz is higher than the proportion of people who accepted the invitation to take the quiz, i.e., people were more likely to reply to the first question of the quiz than to the quiz invitation.